Readers on military service: “Our children will never go into the military all their lives”

The compromise regarding the new conscription gave rise to intensive debate among readers: many readers basically rejected military conscription, especially for their own children. There are also those who criticize weak structures or demand equal treatment for all genders. Still others suspect political diversionary maneuvers. The comments show a divided reader debate.

Refusal of plans for military service

Most readers are fundamentally against military service. They emphasize the moral right to refuse service in the event of conflict or war and see this as a huge expectation of the younger generation. Duration: Compulsory service or even deployment in possible war should not be undertaken without social approval and transparent political debate.

This stance touches a sensitive point in security policy: In Germany, military service was generally suspended until 2011 because it was no longer deemed appropriate by society. Therefore, this renewed discussion raises not only military questions but also political-value questions: Who serves? What for? And under what conditions?

“In their lifetimes, our sons will never enter the military for this group of politicians – let alone go to war…” On the original comment

“‘No, I will not give away my children’ (Reinhard Mey, 1986). Luckily I did not bring any children to this country. It was the best decision of my life…” For original comment

“Considering that we live in 2025, it is still interesting to see that people have to die voluntarily at the request of politicians, when politicians no longer know how to help themselves other than sending their people to the front lines.” For original comments

Doubts about the organization of military service

Other readers directed their criticism at the lack of preparation for a service of this magnitude: the lack of infrastructure, poorly equipped barracks, unclear conscription model, and short-term service deployment were seen as evidence of shallow planning. Real challenges such as personnel shortages, equipment gaps and logistical deficits in the Bundeswehr have been documented. Readers worried that young service members would be sent to a system that did not meet their own standards, further fueling resistance to military service.

“As an affected person, I wouldn’t worry about that at first. The Bundeswehr currently needs a lot of personnel, but doesn’t have accommodation, materials or trainers for them. They know that too. That’s why they just want to ‘waste their time’.” For original comments

“All the former barracks that I know of have been converted into migrant accommodation. Therefore, should the recruits be accommodated in campsites? Back then, the same thing happened to the barracks as today with the explosion of the nuclear power plant.” For original comments

Calling for inclusion of all genders

Another issue is the demand for equal treatment: If conscription is introduced, it must apply equally to men and women. Many readers do not understand why only men must be examined and consider this to be discrimination. Therefore, several parties have proposed a mandatory year of service for all young people. This demand combines aspects of equality with public service ethics: a call for responsibility, regardless of gender. It also shows the extent to which military service is no longer seen only as a security issue, but also as a social obligation.

“Why only men? In the context of equal rights, which is always demanded when there is something to be defended, all women and those who identify as women or others must also be mobilized and, if necessary, recruited. There are no exceptions!” For original comments

“I would very much welcome it if mandatory military service as it was before 2011 was reinstated. However, with two differences compared to then. 1. For both (all) genders 2. Community service is optional, simply by ticking a box without official refusal.” For original comments

Critique of motivation and compensation

Some readers doubt that young people will volunteer and be motivated to serve when reality and expectations are so different. Points of criticism include low remuneration, lack of equipment and unclear placement profiles – which make the service seem like an imposition. Debates over pay levels, conditions of service and public perception of the Bundeswehr played a role in this.

“Soldiers come from mercenaries and that’s where they go. Mercenary armies are essential when the majority refuses to risk their lives for political fantasies. Anyone who goes to BW for 2,000 euros will run away in an emergency.” For original comments

“Subsidized driver’s license? Should truck drivers, tank drivers, etc. pay for their own driver’s license in the Bundeswehr? Should they also buy their own ammunition? It’s already bad that soldiers buy protective vests, boots, etc. because BW equipment is poor.” For original comments

Doubt and distrust of political goals

Political momentum is also viewed critically: readers see the debate as part of symbolic politics in which big words are spoken but little substance is delivered. The impression is that the reforms were implemented without regard to the actual state of the armed forces. In fact, the Bundeswehr faces structural challenges: operational readiness, attractiveness as an employer and future planning are key issues.

“A classic. The ‘harmless’ issue has been half resolved, and the real issue, ‘conscription’, has been postponed so that a new discussion can begin at any time…” Continue to original comment

“You must realize that a turning point has come! Every young German will be lured to the Bundeswehr by the lure of money, training and a large jar of patriotic honey! All this is happening when more than 1,000 Ukrainians fit for military service are coming to Germany every month!” For original comments

Application for freedom of choice

In addition to demands for equal treatment, there are many voices supporting services with freedom of choice. This idea is not aimed at defensiveness but rather at social cohesion. According to supporters, this would encourage responsibility without coercion.

“Why not take advantage of this opportunity and, at the same time, introduce a compulsory year for all citizens between the ages of 18 and 25. All groups of society, including women, can choose whether they want to spend the year in the Bundeswehr, THW or in various social institutions.” For original comments

Irony and sarcasm

As in any political debate, many readers approach this topic with irony.

How do you assess the return of military service and the federal government’s new approach? Is volunteerism realistic, or is there a need for sweeping changes in training and equity? Join the discussion – your opinions enrich the debate!