Establish unique criteria at the national level to identify gaps and building violations. To end regional differences which have recently caused problems in its implementation Save home decisions. In fact, if currently each Region independently presents criteria for cataloging these gaps, in the future this will no longer happen. The enabling bill aims to achieve this goal reform of the Consolidated Building Actit is now close to reaching the Council of Ministers, as confirmed by Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini and Head of Legislative Infrastructure, Elena Griglio.
Reform bill
The text, which is ready, discusses various themes, all related to the revision of Presidential Decree no. 380/2001 compared to the updating of urban planning issues, in which there has been no organic intervention for decades. However, among the various themes, the overall reform of the violation system and its mechanisms stands out in various parts amnestytogether with a review of State and Regional competencies. On the first side, for example, the goal is to encourage regularization of violations made before law no. 765/1967: that would be year zero of development. At the same time, it will be made clear that the amnesty for violations and non-compliance also protects tax relief. In terms of regional competence, the obvious aim is to define the boundaries of the governor’s actions more precisely.
One of the most slippery points in the construction sector is related to amnesties and discrepancies between what the Municipality allows and what is achieved on site. In this sector, for example, there are limitations partial difference (which can be overcome more easily) varies depending on the region. In fact, each Region independently determines the definition of essential variations, starting from small differences that become more significant. In short, the definition of harassment has different colors in different regions.
National classification
This difference creates operational problems. Therefore, the Government aims to provide clearer guidance at the national level. In fact, among the delegation criteria, the DDL explains that it is necessary to “define a general classification types of non-conformity of building permits”, to identify “unique standards for the classification of pathological situations”. In addition, it is necessary to “clearly and exhaustively define each type of non-conformity of buildings, with the aim of preventing uncertainty of interpretation in the application of the relevant definitions”.
However, to provide appropriate limits to the intervention Areathe Government’s idea is to go further. Identify upstream areas that are state provisions that cannot be reduced, that cannot be commented on by the Region, and what levels of essential services cannot be reduced at the regional level. It also includes standard typologies at national level building violations and identification of standards for obtaining building permits under the amnesty.
