Bitcoin Treasury Companies, Whither Thence – atlantisthemes

Bitcoin Treasury Companies, Whither Thence - atlantisthemes

Over 160 publicly listed companies have now adopted bitcoin as a core treasury strategy, collectively holding nearly a million BTC, about 4% of circulating supply. What began as a bold experiment by one firm has morphed into a global playbook: raise capital, buy bitcoin, and deliver partial equity exposure to bitcoin through a listed vehicle. These stocks are trading not on earnings or cash flow, but on their ability to deliver bitcoin per share, and most companies have achieved market capitalizations above Net Asset Value, or as it is now known (“mNAV”) multiples above one. The question now is not whether the BTC treasury model can be implemented, but what comes next in terms of risks and opportunities?

The opening chapter of Bitcoin treasury companies was defined by narrative and replication. Michael Saylor’s Strategy (née MicroStrategy) showed that raising equity at a premium to NAV, converting it into BTC, and never selling could transform a software business into a $100 billion proxy for Bitcoin.

From Tokyo’s Metaplanet, the US healthcare company Semler Scientific to London’s Smarter Web Company, the template spread. But premium multiples may not sustain themselves on storytelling and BTC holdings alone. For this model to survive its adolescence, companies may need to justify NAV multiples above one in more durable ways.

Lever One: Yield as an Edge

Just as REITs matured from landlords into yield machines, bitcoin treasury firms will have to show they can generate incremental Bitcoin per share rather than just sit on their stack.

This may come through BTC-backed lending, Lightning infrastructure, or novel financial products that may monetize balance sheet holdings. For example, locking up BTC into payments channels in Lightning, allows the BTC holder to collect fees for providing this liquidity, potentially providing yield. However, all yield strategies carry risks, which need to be considered and managed, for example credit and counterparty risk. Without a yield engine, dilution could eventually catch up, and mNAV may compress toward one.

Lever Two: Leverage (Risk-Weighted)

The winners in the last bear market were not those with the biggest balance sheets, but those who structured capital to survive forced liquidation. Some BTC treasury companies are currently considering the relative value of pledging their BTC as collateral in BTC-backed loans, to be lent USD. This USD can then be deployed as the company sees fit, for example to earn yield or buy more Bitcoin. However, this type of activity demands rigorous risk management and cashflow and scenario modelling. Leverage amplifies the reflexive flywheel, but it demands discipline: raise only at a premium, never against hard collateral, and keep maturities long enough to ride cycles.