After weeks of tension and controversy, the Trevallion-Birmingham family is trying to bring home the three children kicked out of Juvenile Court. Lawyer work Giovanni Angelucci instead it starts from the critical issues stated in the decree ordering his placement in the community. He reported it Openwhich reconstructs the first developments defensive strategy from the attorney for the minor’s parents.
The reunion passes by the house in the woods
The small stone house purchased in 2021 – just 40 square meters located in the countryside between Palmoli, Tufilo and San Buono – is one of the main elements of the action. Lack of internal bathroom, no connection to utilities, heating with cylinder and water taken from the source is considered to pose a real risk to children. To respond to this objection, the defense submitted a renovation project: the addition of a bathroom connected to the constructed wetland system, additional space for children and general structural adjustments. According to lawyers, a static certificate of conformity has been issued, useful for dispelling doubts about the safety of the building.
Schools, sociality and education outside the traditional circuit
Another important point: school. Children follow the path “not attending school“, without attending traditional classes. The judges noted linguistic difficulties in Italian and lack of socialization with peers. The family now formalizes the parents’ education through comprehensive institutions in the area. Utopia Rose will be able to access third grade, while Galorian and Bluebell will begin recognized and monitored pathways through affiliated schools.
Vaccines, screenings, and complicated relationships with health services
This incident also raises questions in the health sector: children only receive these vaccines vaccination at birth and his parents, on several occasions, refused examinations and medical tests requested by social services. A position which, for the Court, could pose a risk to health protection from small children. Parents defend their choices as part of a natural and conscious lifestyle, but the defense must demonstrate an intention to collaborate at least on matters deemed important.
A case that sparked public controversy
The abolition of minors has resulted reaction wavedivided public opinion between those who denounced state interference in family life and those who considered the measures taken necessary to protect minors. The debate quickly moved into the realm of politics and culture, turning the case into a symbol of confrontation between the two educational freedom and protection obligations.
The call and hope to return
That interesting by Angelucci’s attorney will be filed in the next few days. The aim is twofold: first to expand contact between children and parents, then to have the opportunity to return home to the forest after the work is finished.
A story that, beyond the procedural aspects, tells of an attempt to reconcile unconventional life choices with the standards deemed necessary by the State to guarantee growth of minors. The Court’s decision will determine whether this coexistence is possible.
