New testimony, four years after the discovery of the body Liliana Resinovich. A restaurant owner informed Sebastiano Visitinthe woman’s husband, who a few months before her disappearance, Liliana would ask for and receive from the owner of a pizzeria he knew, and in secret without the knowledge of Visintin himself, two large black bags used for municipal waste.
The newspapers wrote about it today Little One claiming that it was the restaurant owner himself who informed him (who later sold the business) of a meeting with Visintin – who was being investigated for murder – at Visintin’s home.
An interview that took place on Saturday, in which, according to newspaper reports, Visintin was “captured” with his cell phone.
Visitin Records
The registration must have been sent to the police station. The man, Alfonso Buonocore – who also remembers the dishes that Liliana and Sebastiano ate on the night in which the woman asked for the first of two bags (the other she would ask for the next day when she returned specifically to the pizzeria) – said that he had not spoken before, in these three years, because “then a police friend, informally, advised me to mind my own business and not interfere in this story”.
Lawyer for Liliana’s niece: «The statement after so long makes no sense»
Lawyer Federica Obizzi, who helps Liliana’s niece, Veronica Resinovich, is skeptical about the reliability of the statements: «Every time there is important news, there is always someone or something that tries to turn the situation around. A strange, anomalous, absurd thing, which of course makes someone think of a construction. Why does this statement appear after all this time? And why not do it at the police station or at the prosecutor’s office?” asked the lawyer. Recalling how important “two days ago there was a communication from the Supreme Court about the rejection of the appeal for the third autopsy” on Liliana’s body, which was conveyed by Visintin’s lawyers, Paolo and Alice Bevilacqua. «From a technical point of view, these statements – explained Obizzi – should have been conveyed first to the Prosecutor’s Office and then to the media, because an investigation into the murder was underway. The fact that someone told this to the newspapers and the suspect himself leaves no doubt.” The hypothesis is “we are seeing a shift in public opinion. We hope that the Prosecutor’s Office will provide a definite scene, related to reality,” concluded the lawyer.
© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
