PSOE and Sumar criticized this Wednesday the fact that three of the magistrates who convicted Álvaro García Ortiz participated at the end of the trial in paid hearings managed by the Order of Distinguished Lawyers of Madrid (ICAM), one of the accusers in the case against the State Attorney General and who asked him for four years in prison. Both the parliamentary spokesperson of the socialists in Congress, Patxi López, and the head of Justice of the Lower House of Sumar, and deputy of Izquierda Unida, Enrique Santiago, criticized the presence of the president of the court, Andrés Martínez Arrieta, and the judges Juan Ramón Berdugo and Antonio del Moral, as revealed on Tuesday andlDiary.es. In an audio published by TVE and to which Cadena SER had access, Martínez Arrieta is heard rejecting his presentation of the 18th: “And with this, gentlemen, I conclude that I must pronounce the sentence of the Attorney General.” García Ortiz was convicted two days later.
“We need an explanation and I hope that these three judges will explain it to us. Otherwise, we will continue to maintain suspicions about the sentence”, the socialist spokesperson told Congress this morning.
Enrique Santiago defines the final comment of the President of the Court as “unacceptable”. In statements to EL PAÍS, the deputy underlines that these facts serve as an argument for the public prosecutor’s defense when he arrives before the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights. “They should have abstained before they had to be recused,” he believes. His training, he announces, will try to find out “since when they are paid, how much they are paid and until when they will receive” from Icam. It is “unsightly and immoral”, he had asked himself hours earlier in a message on social networks.
Since the sentence became known, Sumar has been very critical both of the sentence – “unjust” and against “an innocent man”, the group defends – and of the fact that it was known before the sentence was published six days ago.
Not very aesthetic and not at all ethical.
Another argument for the prosecutor’s defense when the European Court of Human Rights arrives. https://t.co/pQaF2i0wbu— Enrique Santiago (@EnriqueSantiago) November 25, 2025
Martínez Arrieta has the task of writing the sentence that will have to argue the conviction before the attorney general. Although the course was held between November 14th and 25th, the presentations in which the three judges participated took place on the 17th, 18th and 19th, during the deliberation of the sentence. Martínez Arrieta led a conference entitled Criminal cassation: the new method of cassation against sentences pronounced on appeal by the AAPP. Preparation and filing of the appeal. Appeal of complaint. Criminal review appealfor which he received 180 euros, second elDiario.es.
In addition to Martínez Arrieta, magistrates Juan Ramón Berdugo and Antonio del Moral were also present. The latter is the director of the course. The ICAM was tasked with filing the first complaint against the Public Prosecutor’s Office and bringing the popular accusation against García Ortiz in the trial for revealing secrets.