Andrea Sempio And Mario Vendittitwo names are at the center of the Garlasco case, one being investigated for involvement in the murder of Chiara Poggi by the Pavia prosecutor’s office, the other by the Brescia prosecutor’s office for corruption in judicial documents related to the 37-year-old’s quick dismissal from Vigevano in 2017: Giuseppe Sempio, the father of the friend of the victim’s brother accused of bribing a now-retired former prosecutor to facilitate the separation of the investigation from his son, also ended up in a judicial earthquake.
There are words that the suspects have in common, namely “persistenceOn the one hand Andrea Sempio emphatically repeated it in front of the camera during the interview given to Bruno Vespa, on the other hand Mario Venditti did the same more than once who, thanks to the valuable contribution of his lawyer, lawyer Domenico Aiello, managed to vigorously oppose the decision to confiscate his electronic devices requested by the Brescia prosecutors to reveal the so-called. “Pavia system“.
To respond to these accusations is Guido RispoliBrescia Attorney General, who defended the work of the prosecutor’s office and the transparency of the investigation carried out with the aim of unraveling this complicated case. “No anger”the prosecutor reiterated Brescia newspaper, “The prosecutor’s office and the judicial police are aiming for the best possible investigation results and trying to investigate the confiscated telephones as widely as possible.”
Aiello has three times succeeded in obtaining the annulment of the order to confiscate his client’s electronic devices through Review, but the Brescia prosecutor’s office has no intention of giving up and is now waiting for a decision from the Court. Supreme Court after a formal appeal. In the latter circumstances, it was the absence of “key words” in the decision underlying the investigation into the Venditti device that prompted the Review to once again deny the prosecutor’s request. The prosecutor considered a request that was somewhat forced, because anyone who wanted to hide something on a computer or cellphone would certainly never use explicit words so as not to leave traces of the affair for anyone who might investigate.
“I completely agree with the position of the Prosecutor’s Office”explained Rispoli, “look for ‘keywords’ This is of course not enough, considering that every suspect of average intelligence does not use language in conversation related to the crime he committed so as to enable someone to trace him back to the crime, but always uses ‘encrypted’ language.”. A complicated story, but the Review’s third stop didn’t slow down investigators at all: “The Prosecutor’s Office has filed an appeal, we’ll see what the Court of Cassation’s decision will be.”.
“We are faced with a justice system that is not afraid to question itself, reopen cases for which it has already had a final sentence and investigate its members without looking at anyone’s face,” notify the Attorney General, “if I think about the turbulent times of the past – and in Brescia we know something about that – I say that we must be confident”.
