From tombstones to graves, namely from building amnesty to grave cutting. This year too Such maneuver amendments concern the most different topics. Meanwhile, there is controversy over proposals to require early communication regarding participation in transport strikes with unions calling for immediate withdrawal.
Amendments and inconsistencies: clashes over amnesty
However, only a minimum percentage of the 5,742 proposed changes will be approved by the Budget Committee. In fact, those reported, i.e. those considered to be priorities by the parties, would amount to 414, which is equivalent to sending almost 93% of the total to the attic. The remaining 7% will undergo further eligibility checks, so the percentage will decrease further.
Between the folds of the file there are also ‘inconsistencies’, such as in the case of the development amnesty. In addition to the Fratelli d’Italia’s proposal to restore illegal jobs based on the 2003 amnesty rules, we also found two amendments made by the FdI requesting an increase in the resources of the Fund for the Dismantling of Illegal Jobs managed by the Cassa Depositi e Prestiti from 50 to 75 million.
For the opposition, the amnesty amendment means nothing for Campania. After “Giorgia Meloni in September” “announced the housing plan, there was nothing in the plan, but today as an amendment the Italian Brotherhood tried to grant another amnesty, that is, a wink to those who do not respect the rules, dealing a heavy blow to those who have always respected the rules. Why don’t we make a big plan for housing that has been missing in the country for twenty years? Why don’t we return the rental fund that supports those families who can no longer afford the rent and are at risk of eviction?”, said the Party secretary Democrat, Elly Schlein, guest ‘In altre parole’ on La7.
“The passing of the amendment that reopens the terms of the 2003 amnesty represents an act of justice awaited by thousands of Campanian families who were forced to build homes for housing needs, not for illegal illegal construction. I am grateful to the center-right members of the Campanian parliament who have fought to correct the distortions that, for more than twenty years, have produced a clear gap between Campanian citizens and the rest of the country,” reads the note of the presidential candidate of the Campania Region, Edmondo Cirielli.
“Our region was the only region that did not implement the law because the center-left council at the time chose not to implement it according to the deadline, thus excluding people who had applied by self-reporting and paying fees regularly. Today those families, whom we have always defended, live under the constant threat of demolition, not because of persecution, but because of mistakes made by the center-left region. The same center-left groups that want to demolish the homes of those who had to build out of necessity and at the same time protect them. who are actively forced to occupy these houses illegally”, added Cirielli.
“The amendments included in the maneuver introduce more modern tools for urban and environmental redevelopment, which ultimately allow us to clearly define the position of property that can be regulated, clearly excluding properties that are in the red zone and that are speculative. It is up to the Regions to implement the law by transposition within 60 days. Together with me the President, Campania will be the first to implement it: we cannot waste any more time. We must close the page of injustice and return certainty to the thousands of families who are simply asking for what is already a reality in the region. throughout.” Italy”.
Tomb bonus
Moreover, in maneuvering changes to the unchanged balance (excluding the $100 million parliamentary endowment) to cover these measures, only a small amount of funds were drawn from all available funds or from unspent funds. This comes at the expense of a 36% cut for the maintenance and renovation of tombs with “at least two coffins or at least eight cinerary urns”: it will cost around 40 million for 2026 to 2035 to be financed, we read, with a corresponding reduction in the Development and Cohesion Fund, which is generally said to reduce territorial imbalances.
Storm over the amendment to join the strike
Meanwhile, there is debate over an amendment that would require people to express their support for transport strikes a week in advance. CGIL, Fit-Cisl and Uiltrasporti called for an “immediate withdrawal” and said they were ready to implement “all necessary initiatives to protect transport workers”. In a note, the union expressed “firm opposition to the amendments proposed in the Italian Brotherhood maneuvers that would require workers to communicate their participation in the strike seven days in advance, in written and irrevocable form.” They condemned the move, “which distorts the right to strike guaranteed by our Constitution, effectively creates lists of striking workers and paves the way for questionable pressure and potential discrimination by exacerbating industrial relations.”
“We express our firm rejection of the amendments proposed in the Italian Brotherhood maneuver”, “a measure that distorts the right to strike guaranteed by our Constitution, effectively creates a list of strikers and paves the way for questionable pressure and potential discrimination by worsening industrial relations”, the union said.
