They want to indoctrinate us about reform, the Day of No Coherence and ODG: therefore, today…

– Today I accidentally opened itFuture (I know, I should do it every morning but it causes skin irritation) and I saw this headline: “Faith guides conversion ecological“. Appeal of the Churches. We have come to this, say goodbye to “repent and believe in the Gospel”, the only path to eternal Salvation, but “repent and believe in the green”. So do not complain if young people say: what will I do in the Church, if it is enough to generally move to ecology?

– “You can’t say ‘shame’ to a booing audience”, said the Senate president Ignazio La Russa discussing Rino Gattuso’s words after the Azzurri fans’ protest. He’s absolutely right. Amen.

So, I was (unfortunately) enlisted in the Lombardy Order of Journalists. But if I lived in Liguria, how do you think I would feel about the following course (worth 6 credits) being delivered on order? I’ll quote the statement in full, because otherwise I’ll sound stupid:

Two professions are under attack: career separation and “gag” laws. Genoa rules, insights and discussion. This training course is organized by the board of the Ligurian Order of Journalists with the Anm (National Association of Judges) and with the auspices of the University of Genoa. The issue of the separation of judicial careers as well as the referendum and related laws (Costa and Cartabia) which constitute an effective barrier to crime reporting and the judiciary are also discussed. (…)

They talk about it:

Francis graterchief prosecutor of Naples
Emperor Parodynational president Anm
• Enrico Zucca, Attorney General of Genoa
• Elisabetta Vidali, president of Genoa’s appeals court
Marcellus Basiljournalist and CSM advisor
Maximum Gianninieditorial for Repubblica
• Federico Manotti, president of Anm Liguria
• Alessandra Costante, Secretary General of Fnsi
• Tommaso Fregatti, president of Odg Liguria
• Federico Manotti, president of Anm Liguria
• Massimo Ferrante, Unige professor
• Vincenzo Roppo, Unige professor emeritus
• Federico Delfino, rector of Unige
• Marco Lignana, member of the Liguria agenda council, Repubblica journalist
Sign Fatjournalist Fatto Quotidiano
Sign PreviouslyRepublican journalist
• Matteo Indice, journalist for Il Secolo XIX

I don’t know the position of all the guests, but I read the reports on Odg’s Instagram channel, as well as fromHandleand I’ll just point out a few things. Among the speakers were: Gratteri (against Reform), Giannini (against Reform), Parodi (president of ANM, against reform), Marcello Basilico (CSM board, opposed), Enrico Grosso (president of Committee No), journalists from Republic And Daily Facts (both opposed the Reformation). I don’t see journalists from newspapers like that Newspaper or Sheet (supporting Reform) nor a judge of Gratteri’s caliber would vote yes. Can you explain to me how it is possible that the Association of Journalists, which is supposed to train and encourage discussion, can host such a partisan debate? More than just a course, this looks like indoctrination.

– Sorry: shouldn’t ODG also represent me, poor “right-wing” journalist? Who should I turn to for an objective and pluralistic path regarding justice reform? To Donald Duck?

– Ps: “Francesco Gratteri” is not my fault. I copied and pasted the press release onto the Order’s website. Think about how we are.

– I believe Gratteri is a high level judge. But I wonder: how is this possible? rare (can we say?) in his spoken and televised expressions? We eat so many of those words to make a salad. His pronounced dialect accent was annoying, especially in the mouth of someone who should have learned, at a certain age and level, to hide it when expressing himself in public. He mispronounced several names. Doesn’t that mean Di Pietro is better… or maybe that’s a useful feature for prosecutors?

– I’m more than”No Melon DayI would call it “The Day of No Consistency”.

But how do you put Fridays for Future, green days, war, Palestine, fascism in Italy, and schools in the same container of protest? And most importantly: but why, in the end, does he always beat the police?