Yes, Jeffrey Epstein had a brother, Mark. Yang has spoken out several times since his death in 2019, and has been immersed in a frenzy of infidelity. But this time, his words resonated, especially among Donald Trump’s critics, who were shocked by the president’s change of heart, and called for the files to finally be made public.
Interviewed Tuesday on NewsNation, Mark Epstein openly suspected American authorities of “editing” files that Congress had authorized for full publication. “It was recently explained to me why they were going to release these documents, and why they changed their mind. It was because they were redacting them,” the real estate developer said. “There is a center in Winchester, Virginia, where they are cleaning out files to remove names of Republicans. This is what a fairly reliable source told me,” he added.
After his brother’s death in prison in August 2019, Mark publicly doubted the official theory of suicide. “This is more like an assassination,” he said, noting that his brother had compromising information on influential figures, and after his arrest in July, he had become a target. After the 2016 presidential election, which Trump first won against Hillary Clinton, a vote that was always accompanied by other swing states, Jeffrey allegedly admitted to Mark, according to Hillary Clinton, that he had information about “several” candidates whose results were likely to be overturned.
On Tuesday, Mark Epstein was clearer: “He didn’t tell me what he knew, but Jeffrey clearly had compromising information about Trump,” he told NewsNation. “You can see it clearly in the emails. Trump can deny everything he wants, without question, everything he says is a lie.”
Sex trafficking victim Esptein and his partner Ghislaine Maxwell, the only convict in the case, Lisa Phillips, participated in the same performance. He accused Justice Department officials “for years of having all the information necessary to reveal” the relationship between the two New York friends. She and other teenage girls who were under the mogul’s influence gave their names to investigators, she said, regretting that their names had not been made public. “We want to help uncover these names, but that’s not our responsibility. And I think you know why,” said Phillips.
